Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ricardas Berankis vs Zura Tkemaladze Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Berankis vs Tkemaladze analysis and find out who is favored!
Ricardas Berankis vs Zura Tkemaladze Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Berankis 1 - 0 Tkemaladze
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Berankis has won 49.86% of points on his second serve, while Tkemaladze has won 47.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Berankis, in recent form, has won 53.77% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tkemaladze has won 52.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.52% and 33.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Berankis has saved 59.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tkemaladze has saved 50.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Berankis has won 56.14% of matches played (W/L 32/ 25), with Tkemaladze winning 48.39% (W/L 30/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Berankis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 218/ 107), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 66/ 65). Tkemaladze has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 74/ 67), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Berankis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22), where as Tkemaladze has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.79% of matches (W/L 29/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Berankis winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Berankis winning 2 and Tkemaladze winning 0. The last match between Berankis and Tkemaladze was at the Davis Cup, Group I, PO, LTU-GEO 3-2, 03-02-2024, Rubber 2, I.hard with Ricardas Berankis getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Berankis and Tkemaladze have played a deciding set 0 times, with Berankis winning 0 times and Tkemaladze 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Berankis winning 0, and Tkemaladze 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Berankis has played against opponents with an average rank of 341.07 while Tkemaladze has played against players with an average rank of 112.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Berankis has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tkemaladze has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Berankis has converted 40.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tkemaladze has converted 39.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
307
Rank
50
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
746
Rank
633
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
60% (577-384)
Career Total W/L
46% (104-120)
61% (22-14)
YTD W/L
41% (9-13)
$2,395,158
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Berankis VS Tkemaladze H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Ricardas Berankis | Zura Tkemaladze |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Berankis VS Tkemaladze H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ricardas Berankis | Zura Tkemaladze |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (22/14) | 41% (9/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (49/40) | 42% (22/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (444/404) | 45% (209/257) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 47% (9/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 124 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 97 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:51 | 1:45:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 286.53 | 80.73 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1491/2532) | 67% (930/1388) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1037/1491) | 60% (560/930) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (519/1041) | 47% (215/458) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (113/276) | 39% (60/152) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1062/2607) | 40% (559/1400) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (20/14) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (9/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (21/35) | 38% (8/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (9/14) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (11/16) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (20/17) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (20/3) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 0% (12/0) |
Ricardas Berankis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Blake Mott
Player
Ricardas Berankis
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ricardas Berankis
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Antoine Escoffier
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Brandon Holt
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Ricardas Berankis
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
107)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Ricardas Berankis
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
46%
(
23 of
50)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
5
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Zura Tkemaladze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
12
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Vadym Ursu
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
49%
(
44 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Millen Hurrion
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
56
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Berankis Vs Tkemaladze Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
